Connected Motorcycle Consortium
  • Home
    • Members
  • Safety
  • Applications
  • Basic Specification
    • Overview
    • Assessment
    • Use Case Specification
    • Application Specification
    • System Specification
    • Evaluation Report
    • Other standards
    • HMI
    • Roadmap
  • Research
    • Accidentology
    • Conspicuity
    • Rider Reaction Time
    • Path Prediction
  • News
  • Downloads

News archive

Rider Reaction Time studies

23/5/2024

 
Rider Reaction Time studies
CMC has conducted two significant studies using dynamic motorcycle riding simulators to explore rider reaction times to various warning types. These studies offer valuable insights for enhancing rider safety and designing more effective future C-ITS applications.
Study setup
Both studies compared reactions in urban and rural settings. These did not include imminent crash warnings, but advisory warnings with 3 seconds between warning onset and the potentially critical situation becoming visible.
RRT I (End of 2022) focused on generic visual warnings on the dashboard. Findings indicate that for about one out of six instances, riders failed to notice the warnings. When warnings were noticed, it took riders about 1 second to look towards the dashboard and about 2 to 2.5 seconds to react physically by reducing throttle or initiating braking. Responses were quicker in urban settings, which were deemed more critical by the riders.

RRT II (End of 2023) expanded the research to include 4 more variations regarding the type of warning signals:
  • Visual (Mirror-mounted LEDs)
  • Visual (Head-Up Displays)
  • Auditory (Warning tones)
  • Haptic (Vibrations in wristband)
Picture
The dynamic motorcycle riding simulator at WIVW that was used for the study
Key Outcomes
  • All tested warning methods outperformed the baseline scenario of no warnings, with mirror LEDs and haptic alerts showing no missed warnings at all.
  • The primary reaction across warning types was to focus attention on the road ahead, leading to potentially safer deceleration times.
  • In urban scenarios, riders began braking upon receiving warnings, even before seeing the obstacle. This highlights the potential of C-ITS applications to improve safety.
  • Riders appreciated devices that were fixed on the bike itself, like mirror-mounted LEDs, for their convenience and safety. Helmet- or rider-mounted devices require additional gear and stable connections, and were therefore not so well accepted.
  • Compared to passenger car studies, motorcycle riders had more missed warnings as well as longer and more variable reaction times, underscoring the need for motorcycle-specific safety research.
https://www.cmc-info.net/rider-reaction-time.html

Comments are closed.

    Archives

    October 2025
    June 2025
    January 2025
    July 2024
    May 2024
    October 2023
    May 2023
    January 2023
    November 2022
    September 2022
    April 2022
    December 2021
    September 2021
    May 2021
    February 2021
    December 2020
    October 2020
    April 2020
    December 2019
    September 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016

    RSS Feed

COPYRIGHT 2025 Connected Motorcycle Consortium

PRIVACY POLICY

Contact Us

    Subscribe to our newsletter!

Submit
  • Home
    • Members
  • Safety
  • Applications
  • Basic Specification
    • Overview
    • Assessment
    • Use Case Specification
    • Application Specification
    • System Specification
    • Evaluation Report
    • Other standards
    • HMI
    • Roadmap
  • Research
    • Accidentology
    • Conspicuity
    • Rider Reaction Time
    • Path Prediction
  • News
  • Downloads